PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling
Abstract
As large language models increasingly drive real-world applications, aligning them with human values becomes paramount. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a key technique, translating preference data into reward models when oracle human values remain inaccessible. In practice, RLHF mostly relies on approximate reward models, which may not consistently guide the policy toward maximizing the underlying human values. We propose Policy-Interpolated Learning for Aligned Feedback (PILAF), a novel response sampling strategy for preference labeling that explicitly aligns preference learning with maximizing the underlying oracle reward. PILAF is theoretically grounded, demonstrating optimality from both an optimization and a statistical perspective. The method is straightforward to implement and demonstrates strong performance in iterative and online RLHF settings where feedback curation is critical.
Community
Re-aligning RLHF
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- AlphaPO -- Reward shape matters for LLM alignment (2025)
- Disentangling Length Bias In Preference Learning Via Response-Conditioned Modeling (2025)
- Jackpot! Alignment as a Maximal Lottery (2025)
- Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based Exploration (2025)
- Low-Rank Contextual Reinforcement Learning from Heterogeneous Human Feedback (2024)
- Understanding Impact of Human Feedback via Influence Functions (2025)
- Best Policy Learning from Trajectory Preference Feedback (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper