ROBERT EUGENE MITCHELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent
Mitchell v. State
ROBERT EUGENE MITCHELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ROBERT EUGENE MITCHELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 5908
December 29, 1972
504 P.2d 8
Dennis J. Healy, Jr., of Reno, for Appellant.
Robert List, Attorney General, of Carson City, Robert E. Rose, District Attorney, and Kathleen M. Wall, Assistant Chief Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.
OPINION
Per Curiam:
The appellant was convicted of burglary. His counsel has submitted this appeal pursuant to the command of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), referring to any points in the record that might arguably support an appeal, Sanchez v. State, 85 Nev. 95, 450 P.2d 793 (1969).
The claim of error is that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to stop, frisk and arrest the appellant. The record shows that the arresting officer acted within permissible limits. Barnes v. State, 85 Nev. 69, 450 P.2d 150 (1969); Robertson v. State, 84 Nev. 559, 445 P.2d 352 (1968).
Affirmed.