CASINO CAR WASH, INC., and NEIL STEIN, Appellants, v. WARD J. KOEPENICK, BETTY L. KOEPENICK, GYLE HALVERSON and HANNA INDUSTRIES, Respondents
Casino Car Wash, Inc. v. Koepenick
CASINO CAR WASH, INC., and NEIL STEIN, Appellants, v. WARD J. KOEPENICK, BETTY L. KOEPENICK, GYLE HALVERSON and HANNA INDUSTRIES, Respondents.
CASINO CAR WASH, INC., and NEIL STEIN, Appellants, v. WARD J. KOEPENICK, BETTY L. KOEPENICK, GYLE HALVERSON and HANNA INDUSTRIES, Respondents.
No. 8718
November 22, 1976
555 P.2d 1327
[Rehearing denied December 17, 1976]
Hále and Belford, and J. Stephen Peek, Reno, for Appellants.
Stewart & Horton, Reno, for Respondents.
OPINION
Per Curiam:
Appellants' only claim of error is that certain findings of fact by the district court are unsupported by the evidence. After reviewing the record, we conclude the findings are supported by substantial evidence, and, thus, we will not disturb them on appeal. Alves v. Bumguardner, 91 Nev. 799, 544 P.2d 436 (1975); County of Clark v. Lucas, 91 Nev. 263, 534 P.2d 499 (1975).
Affirmed.