O. P. GOODHUE, Respondent, v. A. E. SHEDD, Defendant. VERDI PLANING MILL CO., Intervenor and Appellant
Goodhue v. Shedd
O. P. GOODHUE, Respondent, v. A. E. SHEDD, Defendant. VERDI PLANING MILL CO., Intervenor and Appellant.
[No. 1111.]
O. P. GOODHUE, Respondent, v. A. E. SHEDD, Defendant. VERDI PLANING MILL CO., Intervenor and Appellant.
Pailuke to Pile Bmees on Appeal. — Appellant's counsel failed to file a bz-ief within tizo time allowed by stipulation. No extension of time was asked for. Judgment affirmed without examination.
Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Washoe County.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Thomas E. Haydon, for Appellant.
George A. Rarilcin, for Respondent.
By the Court,
Hawley, J.:
At the January term, A. I). 1882, this cause was submitted, per stipulation, without oral argument, with leave to appellant to file a brief within twenty days.
On the twenty-fifth of February, 1882, another stipulation was filed, allowing appellant "ten days' further time to file .and serve its brief."
That time has long since expired. No extension of time has been asked for, and no brief has been filed. ,
Appellant having failed to prosecute its appeal, tbe judgment of tbe district court, upon the authority of Finlayson v. Montgomery, 14 Nev. 397, is affirmed.