MAX MORTON GOLDEN, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent
Golden v. Sheriff
MAX MORTON GOLDEN, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
MAX MORTON GOLDEN, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 7761
December 20, 1974
529 P.2d 208
Legarza, Lee, Barengo & Doyle, of Reno, for Appellant.
Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; Robert E. Rose, District Attorney, Larry R. Hicks, and Michael E. Mal-loy, Deputy District Attorneys, Washoe County, for Respondent.
OPINION
Per Curiam:
In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented to the grand jury justified its indictment of appellant. NRS 172.155; Callanan v. United States, 364 U.S. 587 (1961); McWilliams v. State, 87 Nev. 302, 486 P.2d 481 (1971).
"[W]e are not now concerned with the prospect that the evidence presently in the record may, by itself, be insufficient to sustain a conviction." McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 327, 512 P.2d 774, 775 (1973).
Other contentions raised by appellant are without merit. Cf. Baker v. State, 88 Nev. 369, 498 P.2d 1310 (1972).
The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.