In Re MacDONNELL'S ESTATE MacDONNELL v. ARNOTT Et Al.
MacDonnell v. Arnott
In Re MacDONNELL’S ESTATE MacDONNELL v. ARNOTT Et Al.
In Re MacDONNELL’S ESTATE MacDONNELL v. ARNOTT Et Al.
No. 3130
March 13, 1936.
55 P. (2d) 834.
For former opinion, see 56 Nev. 346, 53 P. (2d) 625.
L. D. Summerfield, for Appellants.
Joseph P. Haller and Albert Hilliard, for Respondent.
May 2, 1936.
57 P. (2d) 695.
Per Curiam:
It is ordered that a rehearing be granted in the above-entitled matter as to the claim of Ross Burke Co. only.
It is further ordered that upon the argument on rehearing counsel discuss the effect of the failure of appellants to urge estoppel in the lower court, in view of the rule in Paterson v. Condos, 55 Nev. 260, 30 P. (2d) 383, and also the question of how the conduct of the widow, even if sufficient to estop her, can affect the matter in view of the existence of a minor child.