HAVILAND v. FOLEY Et Al.
Haviland v. Foley
HAVILAND v. FOLEY Et Al.
HAVILAND v. FOLEY Et Al.
No. 3094
January 5, 1935.
39 P. (2d) 198.
Harold W. Haviland, pro se.:
Douglas A. Busey, George Springmeyer and Wm. Forman, for Respondents:
OPINION
By the Court,
Ducker, J.:
On the petition filed herein an alternative writ of prohibition was issued restraining the respondents, composing the board of governors of the state bar of Nevada, from hearing de novo a certain proceeding instituted against petitioner before the local administrative committee for Washoe County.
In compliance with petitioner's request, the board of governors appointed a special committee to hear the matter. This committee heard the charges and filed its report, findings and recommendations. The committee found petitioner guilty of the charges in part, and recommended private reprimand. The board of governors at a special meeting set aside the findings and recommendations contained in the report of the special committee, and ordered that the matter be heard de novo by said board. Hence the application for a writ of prohibition in this court.
1, 2. I am of the opinion that this is not a case in-which the remedy of prohibition may be invoked, for one reason, at least, advanced by respondents. Prohibition will lie to arrest judicial proceedings only. O'Brien v. Humboldt County Commissioners, 41 Nev. 90, 167 P. 1007; In re Cowles, 52 Nev. 171; 280 P. 644. The board of governors do not exercise judicial functions. In re Scott, 53 Nev. 24, 292 P. 291; State ex rel. McCloskey v. Greathouse, 55 Nev. 409, 36 P. (2d) 357; In re Shattuck, 208 Cal. 6; Carpenter v. State Bar of California, 4 P. (2d) 937.
The alternative writ and the proceeding should be dismissed.
It is so ordered.